Wednesday, March 30, 2011

Lesson Plan - Teddy

Class: 32 Secondary 3 mixed ability, self-motivated students with a preference for group work.

Estimated Duration: ~60 mins

Lesson Topic: “Atmosphere” in The Crucible

Learning Objectives/Outcomes: By the end of the lesson, students will understand how “atmosphere” can be used as a central literary device in plays, and how the lesson may impact their personal lives. They will demonstrate such understanding by:

1.     Completing the task worksheet; this worksheet scaffolds their understanding of how the playwright effectively creates “atmosphere”—in this case, the atmosphere of fear which pervades the play. Specifically, students will immerse into the point-of-view of some of the major characters/groups of characters in the play.

2.     Identify (upon personal reflection) in writing, how the lesson impacts their lives—in the sphere of decision-making (to be done as homework). That is, through the process of identifying with characters in the play, they become self-aware as to how fear often corrupts rational thoughts. As such, they are empowered to make more informed decisions under stressful conditions.

Prerequisites-and-Resources:

  1. Students are to have read and briefly examined the plot and main themes in the play.
  1. Students have been briefed on the concepts of (1) the use of “atmosphere”; and (2) the author’s point-of-view in a literary work.
  1. In the previous two lessons, students viewed the 1996 video production of The Crucible. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0115988/
  1. Students have been divided into jigsaw groups of four (with a leader) in preparation for this lesson.
  1. Students are to have brought their annotated text to class.

Lesson Procedure:

Introduction

  1. Students form into their pre-assigned jigsaw groups of four. Teacher explicitly introduces and explains the first two objectives and tasks required of the students in the lesson. Teacher facilitates student achievement of the third objective by asking students to continually make the connection between the character’s thought processes and theirs throughout the lesson. (7 mins)
  1. Teacher hands out scaffolding worksheet [please see appendix]. To discourage free-loading, teacher instructs every group member to take charge of the relevant scene-cum-character(s) involved in one Act in the play. (3 mins)
Development

  1. Students in respective groups work on learning task by silently examining and annotating their assigned text segments. (15 mins)
  1. Teacher forms temporary expert groups by having each member from each jigsaw group join other students assigned to the same learning segment. Teacher instructs students in these expert groups to share, consolidate the main points of their segments, and rehearse the presentations they will make to their jigsaw group. (10 mins)
  1. Teacher instructs students to return to their jigsaw groups and present their findings to the rest of the group. Teacher encourages viewing members to peer critique and clarify doubts after each presentation. Student leader of each group to keep time. Teacher concurrently observes group presentations and facilitates understanding and learning by identifying learning gaps in presentations, if any. (15 mins)

Closure

  1. Teacher rounds up presentation via a Q&A session. (5 mins)
Follow-up

  1. For homework, the teacher instructs students to write a personal reflection piece not exceeding 200 words on the following question:
In what way(s) may this lesson be relevant to your personal life? To get you started, think of how the “atmosphere of fear” present in the play is intimately linked to each character’s/group of characters’ decision-making process.

Appendix (Suggested Sample Worksheet):

For your respective task segments, think as your assigned character/group-of-characters in the scene wouldliving among/as a Puritanand identify in writing at least one decision he/she/they made in that scene. Think of the reason(s) why he/she/they made that particular decision.

Please use the question prompts as a means of “getting into” the minds of the characters/group-of-characters. You are strongly encouraged to draw on real-life experiences.

Act 1

Character(s)-Scene/idea(s) to focus on: Girls (Betty, Mercy, Abigail and Tituba) caught conjuring and dancing naked in the forest.

Think:

  1. An occasion when you were caught for doing something forbidden (eg. underage smoking, etc.); and/or
  2. An occasion when you did something mainly out of peer-pressure (eg. ostracizing a fellow classmate simply because your clique dislikes him/her).
*For both questions, consider: (a) Did you feel it was right to do it? Why or why not? (b) What did you do to get out of trouble/resolve the situation? What thoughts/feelings/emotions guided your decision in resolving the situation?

Act 2

Character(s)-Scene/idea(s) to focus on: The strained relationship between John and Elizabeth; and John’s reluctance to testify against Abigail.

Think:

  1. An occasion when you hurt someone you love (eg. good friend, parent); and/or
  2. An occasion when a person you love betrayed your trust (eg. good friend, sibling)
*For both questions, consider: (a) What did you/the other party do to resolve the situation? (b) How long did the healing process take? (c) Did your/the other party’s behaviour towards the other party/you change since then?

Act 3

Character(s)-Scene/idea(s) to focus on: Mary Warren and the power of rumours.

Think:

  1. An occasion when you heard a rumour about someone you know; and/or
  2. An occasion when someone tried to damage your reputation by spreading a rumour about you.
*For both questions, consider: (a) Did you immediately believe the rumour? Why or why not? (b) Did you or would you try to dispel the rumour if you know it to be false?

Act 4

Character(s)-Scene/idea(s) to focus on: John Proctor’s decision to preserve his name and dignity by dying for the truth rather than living a lie.

Think:

  1. A value/idea you feel is worth dying for.
*Consider: Why do you feel the value/idea worth dying for?

Lesson Rationale:

Selection of text: The content of the play is an easy motivator, since supernatural and paranormal issues are topics most teenagers can readily identify with.

Pedagogical approach: This lesson plan incorporates key elements of both the Deweyan and Freirean approaches to education.

  1. Deweyan: Dewey wrote that education is a moral enterprise. For Dewey, education (1) is life itself; and (2) receives its moral content from its intimate connection with social life.
(a) Education is life itself: Having students reflect on their prior knowledge (personal experiences) as a means of “getting into” the minds of their assigned character(s) makes learning personal for students. As such, they are likely to comprehend and retain the new information more easily. Both the main in-class activity and follow-up activity seek to further enhance student understanding of the learning objectives/outcomes via critical reflection on real-life decision making situations.

(b) Moral content: Immersion into the point-of-view of their assigned character(s) sensitizes students to the need to “step into the shoes of others” before passing judgement of any kind on them.

  1. Freirean: Freire advocates a dialogic approach to education where students are actively involved in the construction of critical consciousness. The jigsaw group discussion strategy employed in this lesson is in line with such an approach. The teacher plays the role of facilitator providing the overall structure for achieving the learning objectives/outcomes, while students are the main persons in charge of their learning.

6 comments:

  1. Hi, I quite like the accessibility of the subject matter, particularly your giving real-life instances of how fear may be a motivating factor in making decisions. If the opportunity arises, do you think you could parallel this with "To Kill A Mockingbird"? I think the role of peer/societal pressure is a salient one and they would greatly benefit from it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Teddy,

    Just a little confused about your mention of a "third objective" in the first point in the Lesson Introduction, I only see 2 objectives.

    Secondly, what exactly is "atmosphere"?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hey Jude,

    Excellent idea :) Thanks!!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi Joel,

    1. Thanks, yup, I should have been clearer :) The third objective was meant to refer to the "personal reflection" section.

    2. The atmosphere is the "mood" of the story.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Teddy - Not exactly Freirean, but I buy your import of Dewey into the lesson's attempt to connect the play with students' personal lives. I'm just not sure if the link with our modern-day fascination with paranormal activity is in keeping with the aim of immersing students in the cultural-religious universe of the text, though...

    Now on to a more complex question (the stuff of educational research):
    You claim that "through the process of identifying with characters in the play, they become self-aware as to how fear often corrupts rational thoughts. As such, they are empowered to make more informed decisions under stressful conditions." Are you suggesting that:
    (a) by empathizing with characters' fear, students will suffer a corruption of rational thoughts? Or
    (b) that the act of empathy also produces a rational distancing from the experiences of the characters?

    On a more philosophical note in relation to (b), what is the relationship between Reason and Feeling, Thought and Emotion, Mind and Body?

    If you can prove through empirical research that imaginative empathy with fictional characters can lead to greater self-awareness, then you have a powerful rationale to offer our MOE for promoting literature education in schools!

    Back to your lesson proper: Do you think that your two specified learning objectives ought to be pursued in two separate lessons? Is there a logical connection between the two? Is there enough time to complete all the questions (excellent as they are) in one 60-minute period for 32 secondary-three students?

    ReplyDelete
  6. 1. “Teddy - Not exactly Freirean, but I buy your import of Dewey into the lesson's attempt to connect the play with students' personal lives…”

    Thanks Warren for pointing out that a distinctive feature of the Freire’s pedagogical approach lies in its political slant, and not mere dialogic group work.

    2. “I'm just not sure if the link with our modern-day fascination with paranormal activity is in keeping with the aim of immersing students in the cultural-religious universe of the text, though...”

    I was thinking more in terms of the “surface” attraction that the text may hold when students first approach the text; just to pique their interest for further “exploration” of the text.

    3. “…(b) that the act of empathy also produces a rational distancing from the experiences of the characters? On a more philosophical note in relation to (b), what is the relationship between Reason and Feeling, Thought and Emotion, Mind and Body?”

    I wasn’t thinking philosophically when I made that claim of rational distancing...I made the claim under the assumption that at adolescence (13-19 years), an important cognitive change takes place—concrete operational stage to formal operational stage—where the child is now better able to empathize with others’ point of view at a more abstract level.(c.f. Ed. Psych – Piaget’s theory of cognitive development)

    4. “Back to your lesson proper: Do you think that your two specified learning objectives ought to be pursued in two separate lessons? Is there a logical connection between the two?

    Where the aim of having students empathize with the characters is concerned, I doubt there is a logical connection. I decided to include the personal reflection-homework component as “part 2” of this lesson, however, so that students could further “see” how learning literature is often personal and hence a valuable and meaningful experience.

    5. Is there enough time to complete all the questions (excellent as they are) in one 60-minute period for 32 secondary-three students?

    I’m quite certain that if they have to complete all the questions individually, they would not have the time to complete the worksheet. Hence, I adopted the jigsaw approach. Hopefully then they’ll be able to complete their assigned section within the allocated time??

    But yup, perhaps even if they managed to complete their assigned sections on time, there may not be sufficient time for the sharing component??

    ReplyDelete