Wednesday, March 30, 2011

Lesson Plan - Carrie

Topic -

Introduction to Feminist Criticism: Stereotypes of Gender using High School Musical 3's A Night to Remember (Youtube video)

Level - Secondary Two (Express)

Students' Profile - 36 students, average ability, mixed learning styles

Learning Environment - Classroom fitted with ICT equipment (visualizer, screen). Teacher should also have access to either a computer/ lap top with internet connectivity.

Lesson duration - 60 mins

Lesson Objectives - By the end of the lesson, students should be able to:
1. Understand that men and women are viewed differently in society.
2. Provide examples of how gender stereotypes are perpetuated in society.
3. Understand that a reader is influenced by his/her own gender in reading a text.






Rationale:
When I started teaching the literature component of the Language Arts program in Dunman High, I was really taken aback at how much my extremely bright students really did not know about how there can be different perspectives, and how different arguments can all have their merits. My students felt that there has to be a right, or wrong answer to EVERYTHING; so they transfered this belief into their schoolwork as well. In my lit lessons, they became disconcerted quite easily, because there were often no right or wrong answers to the open-ended questions that I asked in class. There were either just more justified answers, or less justified answers. This lesson was created with them in mind, them students with high ability but extremely limited exposure to different perspectives in society.

I had to work very hard to convince my students that every one was entitled to their own opinion, and I am certainly not going to give them an answer that they should memorize to regurgitate on their exam scripts or assignments. That said, I must add that this did not deter them from pestering me for "model answers" after EVERY SINGLE LESSON, which I ALWAYS refused. And I was lucky enough that there were no smart alecky students who gave weird answers to my open-ended questions. Dunman High students are extremely docile in class, which makes them good followers of instructions, but I hardly had any student challenge what I taught in class. That is why I feel, that students should understand that content knowledge is not the ONLY reason why education is in place.

In my opinion, one of the purposes of education is to create socially conscious "global citizens". Students should be exposed to different world views and perspectives in education, to understand that there is more to the world than what they have been exposed to. Education should teach people how to care, have empathy for other people, and inculcate a sense of responsibility for the future of the human race. On a more personal level, the purpose of education should enable students to become cultured individuals, who live with integrity and dignity regardless of their social backgrounds. And a way this could be achieved, is through a dialogic education, which subscribes to Freire's belief that education should act as a great leveler for all in society, and provide a space for community.

My lesson allows students to be exposed to the different opinions in the classroom. The initial class discussion and the small group discussion allows students to contribute to their collaborative learning in the classroom environment. For the students who are usually shy and quiet, the small group discussions would allow them a chance to voice their opinions in a less intimidating setting. Since my hypothetical students are of an average ability, I felt that the concept of stereotypes would be clearer to them if it was more obvious (like that shown in the video clip: Boys do not know or care how to dress; Girls are super enthusiastic about makeup and dresses). By asking the students to reflect on whether these gender assumptions apply to them, the students will start to realize that not everything they understand about gender, or people in general, are true. The poster activity at the end of the lesson also allows for creativity on the students' part in expressing their own take-away from the lesson. This was done so that students are allowed to express in ways that are meaningful to them, the content that they have learned. This would serve as a better way to reinforce their knowledge, instead of the usual pen-and-paper reflections.

8 comments:

  1. Your lesson plan sounds engaging. I think students will really enjoy it and internalize the objective you've set out. This lesson seems to lend itself to a constructivist view of education, and provides students lots of room to build up and upon their existing ideas. Your sharing of your teaching experience at Dunman in your lesson rationale was interesting as well. I think your desire to get students comfortable with ambiguity is valuable, and is one of the skills Literature classes can impart to students more readily than other subject lessons.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi, your lesson is very interesting! Just a few thoughts:
    1) Is there a deliberate decision to group the students into mixed groups instead of same-sex groups? I think it will be interesting (and possibly controversial too) because I imagine such a grouping might tease out the gender-biased assumptions of the students.

    2) It might be fun to use a mind-mapping tool to do your tune-in activity as well...maybe even create a word collage (wordle, for eg) to make salient the stereotype ideas that students associate with women.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Maureen and Joel!

    First of all, thank you both for bothering to actually read through my lesson plan! Was not expecting that -.-' Really appreciate your feedback. (:

    And in response to your first question Joel, yes, it was a deliberate decision. I was thinking about the dynamics of a mixed-gender group from my old secondary school days when i decided to include that part in. reason being to continue the possible dialogue between the students on the topic of gender... thought it was more effective if the boys hear the "facts" from the girls about the validity of certain female stereotypes, and it also works the other way round.

    And regarding Wordle and Word splash, i'm afraid i a what Maureen described as a "digital immigrant" in class today. the new technologies definitely did not occur to me as a first choice as i was thinking up my lesson plan...

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hi Carrie, agree with Maureen that your lesson sounds engaging. Also, teaching students to question conventional beliefs/stereotypes is surely a beneficial life skill.

    Yup, just one question that came to mind (from reading your rationale): How do you intend to assess their learning, apart from poster creation? In other words, how would students know if their answers are more-or-less justified?

    ReplyDelete
  6. I LOVE your lesson plan! perhaps because i feel that gender and feminism are topics that i like to discuss and think about.
    it's really engaging and thought provoking :)

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hi Teddy and melody,

    Teddy; I suppose the point of this exercise is to just get the students to realise that their points can be left open (introduction lesson, after all!). I didn't really get to the justification bit yet..! But if i was to continue with feminist criticism in another lesson, i'll prolly bring in to the students that aspect of justifying their assertions.

    Melody: Thanks! (: was a little worried at how i was going to start the lesson, because I think the kids prolly have not been exposed to feminist perspectives at all up till then 9my lesson).

    ReplyDelete
  8. Carrie - your heart is certainly in the right place, i.e. the teaching profession! And I'm glad you see Literature as an exploration and examination of open-ended social and political questions.

    The lesson starts off well by eliciting students' everyday knowledge and beliefs about gendered roles in society. The clip from High School Musical is also a good way to connect with their teenage worlds and pop-cultural interests.

    But the link to LITERARY ANALYSIS, and especially FEMINIST LITERARY CRITICISM, needs to be more carefully thought through. The "text" in this lesson is a film clip/music video. In what way is this clip a "text" in the literary sense? (There are many answers to this [open-ended?] question, which need to be investigated more carefully, especially in relation to our readings for the course.)

    Which leads us to the question: How will you connect this lesson to larger Literature learning objectives? And to repeat Teddy's concern: How will you assess whether they have learned what you want them to learn?

    I think you need also to inquire more deeply into the purposes of feminist criticism. Is it really aimed at promoting a "female-centric" (is this the right word with the right connotations?) point of view in analyzing texts?

    How does the opening exercise (eliciting stereotypes) link explicitly to your point/objective about surfacing the way we READ texts? To what extent is this a moral/civic education lesson rather than a lesson on literary interpretation?

    ReplyDelete