Lesson duration: 60 minutes (9-10am)
Students: Secondary 2 Express, Mixed ability
Class size: 39 (23 girls, 16 boys)
Class’s profile: Mostly comprised of Visual and Audio Learners with a few kinesthetic learners.
Pre-requisites:
1) Students have read the book and have re- read chapter 9 and 10 prior to coming to class.
2) Students are already grouped into groups of 5 (with one group having 4 members)
3) Every group has 2 presenters, 2 secretaries and 1 leader (The role is rotated among group members in every class)
Lesson Objectives:
By the end of the lesson, students should be able to
i) Identify the themes of greed and privilege from chapter 9 and 10 of Animal Farm.
ii) Find specific instances featured in the book to substantiate their claims.
iii) Relate the themes to real- life context and understand that greed and privilege are present in the society in various forms.
Plan: (Click on image)
Laws and rules are a part of everyone's life. Some are obeyed, some are not, and some are just outright ignored. Some rules are "bent" to help an individual or a group when they are caught disobeying them. Identify and select 3 rules from the "Acceptable Behavior" section and 3 rules from the "Unacceptable Behavior" section in your student’s diary that you think are frequently changed to benefit one student or a group of students. Rewrite these rules (just as Squealer did) to make exceptions for certain people or groups. Bring the rewritten rules for the next class.
Lesson Rationale:
The lesson plan is designed according to the five dimensions of meaningful learning, which are, authentic learning, recalling of prior knowledge, collaborative learning, self- directed learning and learning by doing.
The self- directed learning dimension is utilized when the students are made to read the chapter 9 and 10 of the book and are made to identify the themes prior to the lesson. This strategy will ensure that students will take initiative to read the book and research for themes through various means should they need to. This activity will also requires them to recall prior knowledge that they have learnt about the book in previous classes. In addition, the use of group discussions and class dialogues is to encourage collaborative learning by allowing students to learn from their peers. Moreover, the individual activity given to students at the end of the lesson is to encourage learning by doing as well as to enhance authentic learning as students are connecting the themes that they learnt from the book to real life context.
The lesson plan is also designed in close relation to theories of learning encouraged by Paulo Freire and William H. Kilpatrick. Freire has mentioned that “dialogue is an existential necessity” in humans daily life. Hence, the strategy of making the students brainstorm and voice out their ideas in class and in their groups will help to encourage dialogues between students. In addition, the use of dialogues as a means for students to express ideas and learn will also help to forge a sense of community as students who have similar experiences and ideas are able to identify with one other and assist each other to express their ideas in a more coherent manner.
Likewise, the strategy of having the students do the individual activity will also encouraged learning by allowing students to see the relevance of the themes in the book with regards to their concrete realities. The activity will link the themes learnt in the book to the society that the students are living in.
The lesson plan also expressed the aim of learning mentioned by Kilpatrick in which is the synthesizing of the different aspects of the process of learning into a unified “project”. This objective is achieved through the teacher engaging and probing the class to answer questions. This strategy will helped the students to come to a unify purpose of wanting to identify a common theme that is acceptable to everyone in the class. Hence, this activity can be viewed as a project where everyone is involved.
Source of video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NZldlyeR8DU&playnext=1&list=PLF0BEAAE5D2C14571
I like the individual activity that you plan to make students do. It allows the students to see the relevance of the discussion with their real life context. However, after they have substantiated their reasons for the change of the rules they listed, are you going to comment on them or leave the students to believe that they are right?
ReplyDeleteI like the idea that you wish for your students to learn to relate the themes that appear in the text to real-life context and understand that greed and privilege are present in the society in various forms.
ReplyDeleteHowever, while the theme of privilege may appear in relation to students' real-life context from the individual activity, I'm not sure if the theme of greed will be reflected just as clearly.
Also, can the teacher allow the class to engage in either a short group discussion or class discussion instead of doing an individual activity to achieve the third learning objective? The third objective has in comparison, less need for reference to the text, and I wonder if the amount of time spent on the individual activity is justified by the learning outcome.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteKavee - good novel to teach, and rich in themes that can connect with students' lives. Now for me to problematize your lesson plan:
ReplyDelete"Greed" and "privilege" are important concepts, though they do not belong to the same class. How is one related to the other? Why not "power" or "tyranny" or "entitlement" instead of "privilege"? Why not "selfishness" and "pride" instead of just "greed"?
In other words, what if students identify more themes than are represented by the words "greed" and "privilege"?
Do you think 10 minutes is enough time to promote effective collaborative learning? Are 10 minutes enough for each group to share their discussion findings? Would that give you (the teacher) enough time to question and, possibly, correct inaccuracies or ambiguities in their presentations?
You mention the 5 dimensions of meaningful learning. Who is the writer/theorist who came up with these 5 dimensions? How is "authentic learning" defined according to this conceptual framework? And how do your main group activities relate to "authentic learning"?
I'm not sure if there's anything identifiably "Freirean" in your lesson. And how does Kilpatrick's "project method" feature in any of your tasks/activities?